Lede
Coinbase has signaled that it may reconsider its support for the CLARITY Act if the legislation imposes restrictions that prevent stablecoin issuers from offering rewards on cryptocurrency exchanges and other digital platforms. This potential shift in stance comes at a critical juncture for the digital asset industry, as the US Senate Banking Committee is currently scheduled to discuss these contentious issues during a markup session this Thursday. The reported change in strategy highlights the growing tension between major crypto firms and legislators over the future of yield-bearing digital assets.
The debate has spurred significant grassroots activity within the crypto community. The advocacy group Stand With Crypto has claimed that its supporters have sent over 135,000 emails to senators in a concerted effort to protect stablecoin rewards from being banned or heavily restricted. This massive outreach effort underscore how vital these products are perceived to be by both the industry and its users. The upcoming Senate session is expected to be a focal point for these competing interests as lawmakers weigh the benefits of digital asset innovation against the demands of traditional financial sectors seeking to limit decentralized finance provisions.
Context
The legislative environment surrounding stablecoins is already becoming increasingly complex. The GENIUS Act, which was passed in July, explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from offering interest or yield directly to the holders of their tokens. However, this current law does not explicitly extend these prohibitions to crypto exchanges or third-party platforms. This omission has created a perceived loophole that potentially enables issuers to continue offering rewards by working through partner platforms, a practice that the CLARITY Act may seek to formally eliminate.
In response to these regulatory developments, Coinbase has taken the significant step of applying for a national trust banking charter. This move is intended to provide the exchange with a formal regulatory framework that would allow it to offer rewards while complying with banking standards. Currently, products such as Circle’s USDC stablecoin allow users to earn yields of approximately 3.5%, a feature that has become a staple for many participants in the digital asset market. The banking industry is actively lobbying to close these gaps, arguing that allowing these types of rewards to continue unregulated gives crypto platforms an unfair advantage over traditional savings institutions that are subject to stricter oversight and capital requirements.
Impact
The potential restriction of stablecoin rewards carries significant financial implications for both the crypto industry and the traditional banking sector. Stablecoins have emerged as a major revenue driver for Coinbase, with the exchange reporting nearly $247 million in revenue from these assets during the fourth quarter. In addition to this, the firm earned $154.8 million from blockchain rewards during the same period. A legislative ban on these products could hit the revenue streams of Coinbase and other trading platforms particularly hard, fundamentally altering their business models and profitability.
Conversely, traditional banking groups have expressed deep-seated concerns that stablecoin rewards and income-generating products could siphon trillions of dollars away from the conventional banking system. This fear is supported by analysis from the Treasury Department, which estimated that widespread adoption of stablecoins could draw as much as $6.6 trillion out of traditional financial institutions. This massive shift in capital poses a perceived threat to the stability and liquidity of the established banking order. As a result, the legislative battle over the CLARITY Act is being viewed by many as a fight for the very future of capital flows, with trillions of dollars in deposits potentially at stake depending on how the final bill addresses decentralized finance provisions.
Outlook
The timeline for the implementation of new crypto market structure laws appears to be a long-term prospect. Current projections suggest that such legislation may not pass through Congress until 2027, with final implementation not occurring until 2029. This extended schedule is partly due to the expected slowing of legislative momentum as the 2026 US midterm elections approach. These delays suggest that the crypto industry may face several more years of regulatory uncertainty before a clear and permanent framework is fully established for stablecoins and other digital assets.
Despite these cautious projections, some key lawmakers are pushing for a more aggressive schedule. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott has appeared confident that the CLARITY Act can be passed much sooner than the end of the decade. Scott has emphasized a desire to deliver real results for the American people through this legislation, suggesting that there is still a path for more immediate action if political consensus can be reached. For firms like Coinbase, the outlook remains a mix of navigating current legislative threats while preparing for a regulatory landscape that may not be fully settled for several years. The coming months will be telling as the Senate Banking Committee decides whether to accelerate the bill or allow it to follow a more prolonged path toward implementation.
About the Author
