Lede
Financial regulators in France have identified approximately 90 cryptocurrency companies currently operating without the necessary licensing required by the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) framework. The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has issued these warnings as a critical regulatory deadline approaches at the end of June. According to official reports, any firms that fail to achieve compliance with these European standards will be required to terminate their operations within the country by July. This enforcement action highlights the rigorous transition period established for the digital asset industry to integrate into the centralized European regulatory landscape and ensures that all participants meet strict safety standards.
The flagging of these nearly 100 entities underscores the AMF’s commitment to ensuring that all market participants adhere to the MiCA guidelines, which aim to provide a unified regulatory structure across the European Union. Firms operating in France were previously notified of the impending conclusion of the transition period, which is set for June 30. The regulator’s proactive stance is intended to mitigate risks associated with unlicensed financial activities and to ensure that only authorized entities provide services to residents. As the July cut-off approaches, the French market faces a significant contraction of its service provider landscape if these firms do not secure the requisite legal standing. The AMF’s decision to name the volume of unlicensed firms serves as a final reminder that the era of operating without formal European oversight is drawing to a close for those established in the French market.
Context
The current status of the 90 flagged companies reveals a fragmented landscape of regulatory readiness within the French crypto sector. Stephane Pontoizeau, who serves as the executive director of the market intermediaries and market infrastructures supervision directorate at the AMF, has provided specific insights into the responses received from these unlicensed entities. Data indicates that approximately 40% of the unlicensed firms have explicitly stated they do not intend to apply for the MiCA licenses. Furthermore, the AMF warned that about 30% of the unlicensed companies have failed to respond to official queries regarding their future compliance plans or intentions to seek the required license. This lack of engagement suggests a potential exodus of nearly a third of the currently registered but unlicensed firms.
Despite the high number of unlicensed entities, several prominent firms have already successfully navigated the AMF’s licensing process, setting a precedent for others in the industry. Notable examples of companies that have already secured MiCA licenses in France include the crypto investment firm CoinShares and the Switzerland-based Bitcoin application known as Relai. Relai received its official MiCA license from the AMF in October, demonstrating that the regulatory path is viable for established service providers. The presence of these licensed firms demonstrates that the path to compliance is accessible for entities willing to meet the AMF’s rigorous standards. However, the lack of response from a significant portion of the market suggests that a substantial number of operators may be forced out of the French jurisdiction by the summer. The AMF continues to monitor these developments closely as the deadline for the transitional period draws nearer.
Impact
The enforcement actions in France are part of a broader regulatory movement overseen by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). Based in Paris, ESMA serves as the primary supervisory body for the European Union, tasked with ensuring MiCA compliance across all member states. As the transitional period for crypto regulations concludes, ESMA has stated that it expects all companies lacking the proper MiCA authorization to have “orderly wind-down” plans in place. This requirement is specifically designed to protect consumers and maintain market stability by preventing chaotic exits of service providers who are unable or unwilling to meet the new legal criteria once the transitional period ends.
Further centralizing this oversight, the European Commission introduced a proposal in December that would grant ESMA a more centralized supervisory role over all cryptocurrency companies operating within the European Union. This move represents a significant shift toward more uniform enforcement of digital asset laws, moving away from the fragmented national supervision that has characterized the market in previous years. While the proposal aims to streamline the regulatory environment and close loopholes, it has also sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between central EU authorities and individual member states. The expectation for wind-down plans reinforces the reality that the period of regulatory leniency is ending. The impact of these changes will be felt across the entire European crypto ecosystem, as firms must either adapt to the centralized oversight or prepare to exit the market entirely under the supervision of Paris-based authorities.
Outlook
The future of cryptocurrency regulation in Europe is currently a subject of significant debate among member states, with France positioning itself as a central figure in these discussions. French authorities have expressed strong support for granting ESMA centralized supervisory powers to ensure consistent application of MiCA across the entire bloc. This stance is rooted in France’s role as a leading critic of the current EU passporting regime. There are concerns within French regulatory circles that some companies might attempt to seek MiCA licenses in jurisdictions with more lenient standards and then use passporting rights to operate across the EU, potentially undermining the stricter standards maintained by countries like France.
However, this push for centralized oversight is not universally accepted across the continent. Member states such as Malta have openly opposed the move to give ESMA centralized supervisory powers, favoring a more decentralized approach that preserves the authority and autonomy of national regulators. This tension suggests that while the MiCA framework provides a foundation for unified rules, the actual implementation and enforcement of those rules will continue to be a point of contention between different European governments. As France prepares to enforce the July operational deadline for unlicensed firms, the outcome will likely serve as a test case for how strictly MiCA will be applied across various borders. The ongoing disagreement between nations like France and Malta indicates that the evolution of the EU’s digital asset landscape will involve complex political and legal negotiations regarding the degree of centralization required for financial oversight in the coming years.
About the Author
