Lede
India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) has introduced a comprehensive set of new guidelines designed to significantly tighten the process for onboarding users onto cryptocurrency platforms. These regulations represent a major shift in how regulated exchanges must operate within the country, mandating rigorous identity verification protocols that go far beyond standard practices. One of the primary requirements involves the use of live selfie pictures, which are processed through specialized software capable of tracking a user’s eye and head movements. This technology is specifically implemented to prevent the use of AI-generated deep fakes, ensuring that the individual creating the account is present and authentic in real-time.
Furthermore, the FIU now requires geographic location verification as part of the standard onboarding procedure for all regulated entities. This is complemented by the mandatory collection of IP addresses and precise timestamps at the exact moment an account is established. In addition to biometric and location checks, exchanges are now required to verify user bank accounts directly. This is achieved by sending a small transaction to the provided account, a step necessary to satisfy existing anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. These multifaceted rules ensure that every new participant in the crypto space is thoroughly vetted before they can engage in trading activities, providing the agency with deeper insights into user activity and platform compliance across the nation’s digital asset sector.
Context
The tightening of onboarding rules arrives amidst a backdrop of intense regulatory scrutiny from India’s tax authorities. Recently, officials from India’s Income Tax Department (ITD) held a meeting with parliamentary lawmakers to discuss the challenges posed by the digital asset sector. During this session, the ITD expressed significant concerns, claiming that cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms currently serve as tools for tax evasion. The department argued that the inherent nature of these technologies tends to undermine traditional tax enforcement mechanisms. Specifically, the ITD highlighted that decentralized exchanges and anonymous wallets, combined with the cross-border functionality of digital assets, create a complex environment where tracking transactions is difficult.
This regulatory perspective is already reflected in the current tax code. Under the India Income Tax Act, gains realized from the sale of cryptocurrencies are subject to a flat tax rate of 30%. The rules surrounding these transactions are notably strict; users are permitted to deduct only the original cost basis against their gains. Furthermore, the regulatory framework does not allow for tax loss harvesting. This means that crypto traders in India are prohibited from using losses incurred in one transaction to offset gains made in another, regardless of the timeframe. These existing financial pressures, combined with the new FIU guidelines, illustrate a rigorous approach to oversight as officials seek to align crypto trading with national financial and tax policies.
Impact
The introduction of these guidelines is expected to have a significant impact on both crypto exchanges and their prospective users. For the exchanges, the requirement to implement sophisticated biometric software and geolocation tracking systems represents a substantial technical and operational undertaking. They must now ensure that their platforms can accurately process government-issued photo identification while simultaneously verifying email addresses and mobile numbers for every new account. This increased administrative burden is paired with the necessity of conducting bank account verification through micro-transactions to meet anti-money laundering standards.
For the users, the onboarding process becomes considerably more invasive and time-consuming. Beyond providing standard identification, they must now consent to real-time eye and head movement tracking to satisfy the anti-deep fake protocols. Despite these hurdles, the stakes remain high due to the sheer scale of the Indian market. India boasts one of the largest total addressable markets globally, supported by a massive population of over 1.4 billion people. The move to bring such a significant demographic onchain under these strict conditions could potentially lead to a fresh wave of investment, provided users are willing to navigate the increasingly complex regulatory landscape. However, the combination of a 30% tax rate and the inability to offset losses may act as a deterrent for casual traders, potentially shifting the market dynamic toward more committed participants who can manage the overhead of compliance.
Outlook
Looking ahead, the relationship between India’s crypto sector and its regulators appears set for further formalization. The FIU’s new guidelines suggest a long-term commitment to high-tech surveillance and strict identity management as a prerequisite for market participation. As the Income Tax Department continues to voice its concerns to lawmakers regarding the perceived role of cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance in undermining tax enforcement, it is possible that even more stringent reporting requirements could be on the horizon. The focus on neutralizing the advantages of decentralized exchanges and anonymous wallets suggests that the government will continue to push for a more transparent version of the crypto ecosystem within its borders.
The technological solutions currently being deployed—such as the anti-deep fake biometric tracking and geolocation logging—could serve as a blueprint for other jurisdictions looking to regulate large-scale digital asset adoption. While the current 30% tax rate remains a significant hurdle for the local trading community, the government’s priority remains the protection of its tax base and the prevention of illicit financial flows. As the population of 1.4 billion continues to interact with digital assets, the success or failure of these strict onboarding and tax policies will likely determine whether India remains a central hub for global crypto activity or if the regulatory friction slows the pace of adoption. The ongoing dialogue between the ITD and parliament suggests that the legislative environment is still evolving, with a clear focus on closing perceived loopholes in tax enforcement.
About the Author
