Lede
The digital asset industry is currently witnessing a significant divergence between emerging crypto products that mimic traditional financial services and the established banking sector that views these innovations with skepticism. JPMorgan has recently issued a caution regarding yield-bearing stablecoins, suggesting that these assets risk recreating core banking functions without the regulatory safeguards established over decades. This warning comes as crypto-native companies aggressively expand into territory once reserved for traditional institutions. For instance, World Liberty Financial is actively moving its USD1 stablecoin into the crypto lending sector through a new platform known as World Liberty Markets. Simultaneously, Figure Technology is exploring the limits of blockchain infrastructure within capital markets by enabling on-chain stock lending that is tied to real equity.
These developments highlight a growing tension as the reach of digital asset markets expands. While traditional banks emphasize the need for prudential standards, firms like World Liberty Financial are already managing significant scale, with their USD1 stablecoin reaching a market capitalization of $3.4 billion. The integration of stablecoins as core settlement assets in new lending and borrowing platforms represents a shift toward a parallel financial system that operates on decentralized infrastructure. As these two worlds collide, the industry is forced to reconcile the efficiency of blockchain-based lending with the stability provided by traditional oversight and governance models.
Context
JPMorgan Chase has maintained a complex relationship with the digital asset space, having previously embraced blockchain technology and expressed interest in the utility of stablecoins. However, the bank’s current stance highlights a specific concern regarding interest-bearing versions of these assets. According to JPMorgan, yield-bearing stablecoins could essentially replicate core banking functions while remaining outside the purview of the regulatory and prudential standards that govern traditional banks. The institution argues that creating a parallel system with features similar to interest-paying deposits, but without associated safeguards developed over centuries, presents an undesirable risk to financial stability.
In contrast to this cautious approach, other major financial institutions are moving forward with strategies that signal a deeper engagement with the crypto ecosystem. Morgan Stanley has recently made exchange-traded fund (ETF) filings that analysts identify as a marker for the next phase of institutional adoption. This shift is viewed by Binance Research as a structural pivot in the market, moving away from simple retail interest toward comprehensive institutional participation. While JPMorgan focuses on the potential dangers of unregulated banking functions, Morgan Stanley’s actions suggest that some of the world’s largest wealth managers are ready to lead the integration of digital assets into mainstream investment portfolios. This divergence in strategy between two of the world’s most influential banks underscores the lack of consensus on how to navigate the evolving digital asset landscape.
Impact
The expansion of crypto-native platforms into traditional market sectors is already producing tangible changes in how equity and debt are handled. World Liberty Financial’s move into crypto lending utilizes its USD1 stablecoin, which has achieved a market capitalization of $3.4 billion, to facilitate borrowing and lending operations. This platform allows users to post various forms of collateral, including Ether and tokenized Bitcoin, with USD1 serving as the primary settlement asset. This transition moves stablecoins beyond simple payment tools and into the role of foundational capital in a new lending ecosystem.
Furthermore, Figure Technology Solutions has launched the On-Chain Public Equity Network (OPEN), a system designed to transform stock lending. Unlike traditional methods that rely on synthetic exposure, equity issued on the OPEN platform represents actual ownership of the shares. Figure’s infrastructure allows investors to lend or pledge shares directly to one another on-chain, removing the need for traditional intermediaries such as custodians. This use of the Provenance blockchain is a direct test of how effectively decentralized infrastructure can replace the legacy systems of capital markets. According to Figure CEO Mike Cagney, this direct on-chain interaction provides a more streamlined approach to asset management. The success of such platforms could significantly reduce the industry’s reliance on centralized financial intermediaries, fulfilling a long-standing promise of blockchain technology to disintermediate complex financial transactions.
Outlook
As the digital asset market matures, the competitive landscape among major financial institutions is expected to intensify. The proactive stance taken by Morgan Stanley in the ETF space is likely to place significant pressure on other global banks, including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, to accelerate their own cryptocurrency strategies. Analysts suggest that to remain competitive in an environment where institutional participation is rapidly expanding, these banks may need to reconcile their regulatory concerns with the necessity of providing digital asset services to their clients. The next phase of adoption, as identified by Binance Research, implies that the industry is moving toward a more integrated financial infrastructure.
The growth of infrastructure-focused companies also provides a glimpse into the future of decentralized finance. Figure Technology Solutions has seen its market capitalization rise to approximately $12 billion following its initial public offering in September. The sharp rise in the company’s valuation reflects a growing market appetite for blockchain-based financial infrastructure that can handle real-world assets. As more companies express interest in issuing shares on platforms like OPEN, the boundary between traditional equity markets and on-chain networks will continue to blur. The ongoing development of these platforms, combined with the pressure on major banks to adapt, suggests that the integration of blockchain into the core of global capital markets is a trend that is likely to persist despite the cautionary warnings from traditional regulatory voices.
About the Author
