Lede
US Senator Elizabeth Warren is currently applying significant pressure to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, urging the country’s primary banking regulator to suspend its consideration of a bank charter application submitted by World Liberty Financial. In a formal letter delivered on Tuesday, Warren specifically requested that Comptroller Jonathan Gould delay any review of the application for a national trust bank until Donald Trump successfully eliminates all financial conflicts of interest. This demand extends to both the president himself and his family members who are involved with the crypto company. The entity at the center of this dispute is a World Liberty subsidiary known as WLTC Holdings, which filed for the charter earlier this month.
The goal of the charter application is to allow the firm to issue, custody, and convert its stablecoin, which is identified as USD1. Senator Warren, who serves as the most senior Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, has voiced strong opposition to the timing of this filing, citing what she describes as financial conflicts and potential corruption of a magnitude never seen before in this context. Furthermore, Warren argued that the United States Congress did not effectively resolve these types of conflicts when it originally passed the GENIUS Act into law. Consequently, she believes it is now incumbent for the Senate to address these serious issues as it moves forward with discussions on crypto market structure legislation.
Context
The regulatory backdrop for this conflict involves the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation specifically designed to regulate the stablecoin market. This act, which was signed into law by Donald Trump last year, established the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) as the primary regulatory body for stablecoin issuers. Under the provisions of this law, the OCC is tasked with the critical duties of approving various applications and maintaining ongoing supervision of companies operating in this space. This legislative framework essentially placed the OCC in charge of the very sector where World Liberty Financial and its subsidiaries seek to operate.
World Liberty Financial is notable for its high-profile leadership, as President Trump and his sons—Barron, Eric, and Donald Trump Jr.—are officially listed as the company’s co-founders. Because of these direct ties, the application by WLTC Holdings for a national trust bank charter has drawn intense scrutiny from lawmakers. Senator Warren’s role as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee gives her a significant platform to challenge the current regulatory proceedings. She maintains that the absence of strict ethics provisions in current laws creates a vulnerability in the financial system. The application for the USD1 stablecoin represents a significant move by the Trump-linked firm to establish a foothold in the regulated stablecoin market, making the OCC’s decision-making process a central point of political and financial debate.
Impact
The primary concern regarding the impact of this charter application involves the potential for compromised regulatory independence within the OCC. Senator Warren has stated that she has no confidence in Comptroller Jonathan Gould’s ability to conduct a fair assessment of the World Liberty application pursuant to legal standards. She pointed to Gould’s past dismissal of questions concerning how he would ensure that President Trump would not exert influence over the OCC’s decisions. Because the Comptroller is responsible for enforcing laws not only against World Liberty but also against its market competitors, the perceived conflict of interest is substantial and multifaceted.
Furthermore, Warren highlighted that Gould would be in a position to oversee rules that directly influence the profits of World Liberty. Under the current structure, Gould serves at the pleasure of the President, which Warren suggests creates a historic anomaly where the President of the United States would effectively be in charge of overseeing his own financial company. This dynamic could impact the competitive landscape of the stablecoin industry, as other issuers may face different regulatory pressures compared to an entity with direct ties to the executive branch. The pressure from the Senate Banking Committee highlights a significant challenge for the OCC in maintaining the appearance of impartiality while fulfilling its supervisory duties over stablecoin companies. If the OCC proceeds without addressing these divestment demands, it may face continued friction from senior lawmakers who argue the integrity of the regulatory system is at stake.
Outlook
The future of the World Liberty Financial bank charter bid is closely linked to the upcoming legislative calendar of the United States Senate. The Senate Banking Committee is currently scheduled to debate a crypto market structure bill this Thursday, a session that is expected to include discussions on how to better manage the intersection of digital assets and traditional banking oversight. While this debate moves forward, other related legislative efforts have seen changes in timing. The Senate Agriculture Committee, which had originally planned to debate the same bill simultaneously, recently decided to delay its proceedings until later this month.
This delay, announced by the committee’s Republicans on Monday, is intended to facilitate further negotiations aimed at securing bipartisan support, particularly as several lawmakers have pushed for the bill to include robust conflict-of-interest guardrails. Recent drafts of the legislation from the Banking Committee have notably lacked the ethics provisions requested by senior Democrats like Senator Warren. However, further negotiations and amendments are anticipated before the bill advances. The outlook remains uncertain for World Liberty Financial, as the outcome of these legislative debates will likely dictate the standards the OCC must apply to its application. As the most senior Democrat on the Banking Committee, Warren’s influence over these upcoming negotiations will be a key factor in whether new ethics rules are successfully integrated into the market structure bill or if the current charter application proceeds under existing frameworks.
About the Author
